On The Road to Jericho

“A man was going down the road from Jerusalem to Jericho when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead.”

So begins St. Luke’s account of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30), one of Jesus’ best-known parables in the New Testament.

The parable is well known to Christians, but probably not to others. The half dead man is passed by a Jewish cleric who goes to the other side of the road and keeps going. A second Jewish cleric does the same. But then comes the Samaritan who dresses the man’s wounds, takes him to a nearby inn, pays for his stay and tells the inn keeper to look after him and that he will pay him any additional money owed when he returns.

All 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia have “Good Samaritan” laws. While the particulars may vary from state to state, the gist of the laws is to protect a stranger from providing assistance, even if the assistance goes wrong . I suspect that our current society is considerably more litigious than was the case in the first Century A.D.

There are two keys to the parable. First, the Jewish clerics who pass by even though you would expect a rabbi, a minister or a priest to stop and lend aid. Then there is the Samaritan.

In first Century A.D., when religion was a very serious matter, a Jewish person would have nothing to do with a Gentile but, God forbid, it was much more damming to deal with a Samaritan. The Samaritans lived on adjoining land and claimed Moses as a common ancestor but had mixed him up with pagan gods, intermarried and provided refuge to Jews who had been kicked out what is modern day Israel for perceived sin or crimes. They were the lowest of the low and, yet, it was a Samaritan who showed mercy to the half dead Jewish victim.

So, the point of the parable is that the most reviled person is capable of great mercy while those who should be particularly merciful are not. And remember the Jewish hatred of Samaritans was reciprocated so the Good Samaritan was not expected to be good toward a Jew.

So, fast-forward 21 centuries on the road to Jericho. Suppose the half dead person was Nancy Pelosi or Liz Cheney or Joe Biden or Adam Schiff. The person on the road was Donald Trump. Do you think he would stop or do you think he would say “what a bunch of losers” and then proceed on his way to Jericho?

But let’s reverse this and make Donald Trump the half dead person. Nancy Pelosi or Liz Cheney or Joe Biden or Adam Schiff is the person on the road. Would they give aid or go on to Jericho?

I did a non-scientific study of the answers to those questions. Of the seven people, two were extremely pro-Trump and five were anti-Trump although one of the five was more moderate than the rest.

The adamantly pro-Trump people were convinced that he would render aid or arrange for aid to be provided. They were equally convinced that Pelosi et al. would skedaddle onto Jericho.

The five anti-Trump people were more nuanced. Four of the five thought that Trump would ignore his half dead enemies. Two of those four thought that Pelosi would render aid. Two of those four thought that neither Trump nor Pelosi et al. would lend aid.

The most interesting response of the five was that of my daughter Megan. She thought that Trump would render aid but Pelosi et al. would not. But her reasoning was different. She is no admirer of Trump but thought he would render aid because he would want to take credit for it, maybe to burnish his Nobel prize nomination. When I asked whether he would do it if no one was looking, her answer was equally interesting. Yes because Pelosi would tell the truth and hence Trump‘s claim would be verified. 

It is a sad commentary that we have come to this where different political persuasions cannot believe that certain people will not do the right thing. Our politics have distorted our moral compasses and certain of our politicians have lost their moral compasses. That is not to say that all people are Good Samaritans, far from it. Remember, in the parable, two of the three went on to Jericho. 

Now, what is your answer to the Trump/Pelosi questions? If you care to post a reply, you must tap on the title of the blog and then a button will appear to allow you to reply.

 Equally important is what you would do.

Note to believers: Jesus is watching and can spot a liar a mile away. 

Post a Reply

7 thoughts on “On The Road to Jericho

  1. Joan

    Jay nI thought this was a thought provoking blog. I think Nancy and Chuck would help Trump becsue they are good people and despite Trump being totally unredeemable, their integrity would not leave him on the road. Me I might leave him on the road and consider it a just punishment for all of the truly evil things he has done.

  2. Tom Figel

    Jay, no one from either major party, I believe, would move to help the victim in the spontaneous manner of the Gospel story. Yet, after polling, aid could be given by any party. There would be media attention, requests for donations, posturing, and charges that the rivals would have ignored the need. – Love, Tom

  3. Adwoa Boadi

    I’d like to think that in this day and age, regardless of political affiliation or affinity, anyone would stop to make a call to 911 to help someone in need.

    I would help without a doubt. But, then again, I believe in “love thy neighbor as thyself”.

  4. Dot Malone

    Great, Jay, a very cohesive and interesting blog. I agree with both Joan and Megan in some way. Yes, Nancy, Liz, and Joe’s reaction wouldl flow from the way they were raised and lived their lives. There spirituality would most certainly kick in, They would act according to Catholic Social Teachings and from a ‘good heart’.

    I also thought Megan’s insight about Trump ‘ getting praise and glory ‘ would lead Trump to stop and help. Al least he would assign someone to do it instead.

    On the other hand, I think Trump probably would not stop. Whjy would he? Look at how many people he has already ‘walked by’ – too many of the poor, the hungry, the homeless, those needing mekdicing, etc.

    Yes, I would stop for Trump. For, in the end, he is ‘a child of God’ and one who truly needs our prayers.

  5. morty mittenthal

    I certainly wouldn’t help Trump in any circumstances, especially since he was gleeful about the attack on Paul Pelosi and the fact that he pardoned all the Jan 6th thugs, even the ones who beat up cops. Not counting the myriad of other wrongs he’s righted on our country. No way. No how. If I had a hammer, I would smash him in the knee caps for good measure.

    Actually, I feel almost the same way about John Roberts and Ruppert Murdoch, the 2 men who are most responsible for ruining our country.

    I would help Ronnie, if he was still around, even though I wasn’t a fan.

  6. morty mittenthal

    Thanks Jay! Hi to Laura May. Glad you guys got a kick out of my reply but funny not funny. Sorry not sorry. You have so many nice people who read your blog. Way too nice for me.

    Keep up the good work. It always gets me thinking…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *